LANSARY. Aerospace Bring us the decision
Aerospace · screen the counterparty

Is this teaming partner safe to commit to before you sign?

A teaming partner, a JV member, a sub-tier — what looks clean on the contract can hide a parent, a control chain, or a sanctions or screening exposure one or two ownership tiers down.

Settled as the Teaming Evidence Pack
The exposure

Independence checks lean on what a counterparty declares. The tie that matters — the ultimate owner, the adverse control, the screening exposure — usually sits a tier or two below the name on the page, where a self-declaration never reaches.

What the Teaming Evidence Pack settles

Who you’d really be committing to.

Who really owns and controls them?
The parent, the control chain and the ultimate beneficial owner behind the name on the contract.
Is there a sanctions or screening exposure?
An adverse tie, a designation, or a control change that could be called in — traced before it surfaces mid-programme.
How sure are we?
Each finding graded against the published standard, and held in confidence.

Typical reader: a programmes or partnerships lead.

Why now

Who controls your partner is a live question.

On 8 December 2025 Boeing and Airbus closed their carve-up of Spirit AeroSystems — who controls airframe work packages, and the make-versus-source decision behind them, changed at sites across the chain. And the National Security and Investment Act annual report (22 July 2025) recorded Defence as the most-screened sector, with 56% of all notifications and a sharp rise in conditions and unwinding orders. Who controls your teaming partner is a live question, not a formality. See what changed →

Engage

Name the partner you can’t afford to be wrong about.

We’ll trace who really owns and controls them, and any sanctions or screening exposure — to what grade, before you sign.

You may also be asking: Is the position defensible? · What are you really buying?